Sunday 28 June 2020

Whatever rows your boat - the Battle of Pylos (425BC) re-enacted


Sometimes mistakes can turn out for the best, in wargaming as in real life. I ordered triremes by mistake - mine, not theirs - from the excellent Outpost Wargaming, a deliciously inexpensive and suitable way to create as large an ancient fleet as one could possibly want. Could I find a way to utilise a hundred or so triremes as a way to try out David Manley's ancient fleet naval rules? It turned out that I could: the battle of Pylos was ideal in size, and an exciting scenario into the bargain. 

At this battle, a Spartan force sent to relieve their men ended up being trapped in the harbour - later to become even more famous for the Battle of Navarino - and was defeated by Demosthenes' Athenians, fleeing out to sea and leaving their men eventually to be ransomed, a key event in the history of the Peleponnesian War. Could I recreate something like his victory? 

The geography of the battle was tricky, according to a nineteenth century summary of the principal account:
Thucydides describes the harbour, of which the promontory Coryphasium formed the northern termination, as fronted and protected by the island Sphacteria, which stretched along the coast, leaving only two narrow entrances to the harbour, - the one at the northern end, opposite to Coryphasium, being only wide enough to admit two triremes abreast, and the other at the southern end wide enough for eight or nine triremes. The island was about 15 stadia in width, covered with wood, uninhabited and untrodden, (Thuc. iv. 8.) Pausanias also says that the island Sphacteria lies before the harbour of Pylus like Rheneia before the anchorage of Delos (v. 36. § 6)

(William Smith, 1854).

A map:

Here's what it looks like now, time having wrought some changes to the harbour, essentially increasing  it in size by creating a lagoon to the North.

I ended up rendering it like this - here, the Spartans are in the bay awaiting their fate:

A first for me: the ground scale for this battle (though not quite the vertical) was the same as the ship scale, i.e. 1/3600. That really is the approximate size of the harbour. 

And here, the Athenians approach:

They are 49 strong, in seven squadrons of seven ships, each, plus one Admiral, facing a Spartan force of 43 in six squadrons, but of more varied size, and their Admiral. Notice the narrow entrance to the harbour - and that's the wide one to the South, shown in the photo above. Although there is some debate about how wide the entrance actually was, there is general agreement that the Northern entrance to the harbour is extremely narrow, possibly only wide enough to allow a single ship through at a time. No place to be making an entrance, though, was my view as Demosthenes.

At this point, a brief digression on the rules. David Manley himself says this in the introduction to the rules, 'Greek Fire and Roman Fury'.

'One of the regular debates that my wargaming chums and I seem to have is the one about “whose role are we taking when we play a wargame?” Are we playing ship’s captains or fleet admirals? In general naval wargamers tend to assume the role of admirals whilst demanding a level of detail more appropriate to games set at the lower level. For most cases this is isn’t too much of a problem as the numbers of ships tends to be relatively small, and there are fleet level rules with appropriate levels of abstraction available for most periods. However, the ancient period seems to one where all available rules operate at the ship level. Obviously this makes battles such as Salamis, with hundreds of ships involved, difficult to handle. I wanted a set of rules that could be used to recreate these enormous battles whilst placing the players truly in the roles of admirals and squadron commanders. At this level the fate of individual ships is unimportant. Hence, “Greek Fire and Roman Fury” was born. 
The basis for these rules is a theory that the naval battles of antiquity were fought in a similar style to land actions. Therefore, in these rules, the respective fleets are represented by squadrons rather than individual ships, which are manoeuvred around the “battlefield” in a similar manner to armies. After a few false starts I decided to use “Fire and Fury” as the basis for the system, hence the name I finally selected..'.
On this basis, you can be sure of what you are getting, and GFARF do not disappoint. Squadrons are represented by a base with anywhere between two and eight ships, commanders have qualities that affect their performance, ship data are provided for a wide range of ancient types - we were both Aphract Triremes, so no shooting on this occasions, just melee. Squadrons have a limited range of formations - the Athenians were in the Diekplous - whilst morale and movement are combined in a single table, as in F&F. Simple, straightforward rules that will be well-suited to a major ancient fleet action once David has finished his final tweaks.

As my ships passed the headland to their North, with Pylos to their South on the other side of the entrance to the harbour, I felt quietly confident:

The Spartans did not lack courage: they came on immediately.. Out we went into single line to face theirs:

And some tough melees ensued. At first it did seem that the larger Athenian squadrons would have the advantage, despite the fact that a significant proportion of my force was still trapped in the entrance, undoubtedly the right thing for the Spartans to do:
 

But as the fight began to break up into squadron actions, the numerical advantage of the Athenians was not available to their best advantage. 
 

At the height of the battle, the forces were still struggling around the harbour entrance, a quite different state of affairs than in history, where by this time the Spartans had fled. 
 

The Athenian formation had not played to their advantage, and their losses became heavy - two squadrons in a single move, in fact, and even a couple of ships lost to collision. By the end of the battle, ten moves in total, all their remaining ships could do was to decide to turn tail and flee, leaving the harbour to the Spartans, no doubt a significant number of Athenian prisoners from those who had escaped sinking ships and swum to shore, and most importantly - no ransomed Spartan army. What misplaced confidence on my part!
 

This was a most enjoyable and rewarding test action, which gave us confidence that in due course we would not only be able to fight much larger ancient naval actions, such as those of the Punic Wars, but would be able to integrate naval actions and land actions into a campaign, should we choose. 

References

Kagan. D. (2003) The Peloponnesian War. London, Penguin

Outpost Wargaming 1/3600 galley range http://www.outpostwargameservices.co.uk/

Smith, W. (1854) Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography. London, Walton & Maberly. Available [extract] at at: https://www.gtp.gr/LocInfo.asp?infoid=49&code=EGRPME40NSTNST00061&PrimeCode=EGRPME40NSTNST00061&Level=10&PrimeLevel=10&IncludeWide=1&LocId=61633 Retrieved 1 June 2020. 

Thucydides History of the Peloponnesian War. 4:11-14.



17 comments:

  1. Strange. Only the first map image shows for me from my iPad. Perhaps I will switch to pc and see if images appear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure what happened, they were visible to me, but James has been very kind and re-posted the photos, they should be visible now.

      Delete
  2. Most interesting background and game of a little-played aspect Julian. Those little triremes tested my eye sight!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks James. The triremes are indeed a little small, but the quinqueremes are significantly larger. But on a base to move around together, even the triremes are fine.

      Delete
  3. Looks a good set-up and scenario to play. Looks like it would be rewarding re-play it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We enjoyed it! Which rules you pick of course depends on how long you want to spend doing it. One day is enough for us.

      Delete
  4. Very nice setup and report. If the map was limited to the SW corner of the harbor and the entrance, it might be practical to do this with 1:1200 models. I don't have the GFARF rules, but I may try it with Hail Agrippa.
    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, undoubtedly it would, and it would look absolutely magnificent with 1/2000 ships. I suppose it would be possible to map play it out until the engagement began, that way you wouldn't be limited to just one corner of the harbour. I'll take a look at Hail Agrippa, thanks for that.

      Delete
  5. Hi guys,
    Just came across your blogsite tonight whilst doing some late night research for some gaming projects that I am planning. Noticed that you've already covered the ground that I am going to be travelling down soon (the 2012 Borodino refight) but using FoGN 2 rules instead.

    But I am here basically commenting and smiling in appreciation over your remarks about the likelihood (or possibility) of initiating a joint naval-land campaign in this era in which I have only just started to take a serious interest. Oddly enough, this is precisely what I am planning (solo of course) using Hoplomachia (land) and Naumachiae (naval) as my guiding rules.

    Anyway, wanted to say I'm impressed and will be linking and recommending this blogsite to my gaming circle. Regards. Lawrence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Lawrence, Many thanks for your kind remarks. In the 1990s I re-wrote Lazenby's Second Punic War on the basis of a campaign that the Carthaginians fought properly. It all finished with Rome burned to the ground, a fitting end. Something naval-land, this time, but equally Punic, I think! I knew about Naumachiae, but not Hoplomachia, I'll take a look - we use Impetus 1st Edition. For Napoleonic land wargames, we've generally used Shako, again 1st Edition. Do you have a blog yourself? Best, Julian

      Delete
    2. Thank you for existing. Sorry for not replying sooner; I've been busy with several gaming projects - mostly solo. Just signed on to take part in a global kriegsspiel game refighting Operation Sealion 1940 about to kick off next month. The Perfect Captain is a hidden treasure trove of rules I came across several years ago. Hoplomachia was one I took to because of the details that gave period its "flavour" for want of a better word. Using a small set of 15mm minis from Eureka Miniatures. Just have to purchase the ships. And, yes, I have a blogsite but it's a bit of a mess as it's a mix of wargaming, creative writing and musical interludes. Lol.

      Delete
  6. Introducing youtube go for android 4.0 4 A brand new app to download and watch videos YouTube Go is your everyday companion,

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is very good blog post, I like your content writing skill and I have also something to share:

    norton.com/setup
    www.norton.com/setup
    norton download
    norton setup

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is very impressive content writing work, i like to read more from you and have some useful security links to share:

    mcafee.com/activate
    www.mcafee.com/activate

    ReplyDelete
  9. job today Pre-consumer: Pre-consumer paper includes scrap paper created from manufacturing paper products, first print runs that are used to test print jobs, end of roll tubing, and misprints.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Tamil Nadu Board which Conducts the Examination of Plus Two in Month of March. Supplementary Examination Conducts in month of Jun. Tamil Nadu 12th Question Paper 2021 TN DGE board Annually and Private and Regular Students Participate in Plus One & Plus Two Examination every year more than laks of students.

    ReplyDelete